Aston Villa in the FPL tools: clean sheet chance match by match, and the squad by projected points in Premium.
Aston Villa best players for GW6-11
| # | Player | Pos | Price | Owned | 6GW xP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Buendía | MID | 5.9 | 1.0% | 23.4 |
| 2 | Suzuki | GKP | 5.0 | 1.9% | 22.1 |
| 3 | McGinn | MID | 5.4 | 2.2% | 20.4 |
| 4 | N.Jackson | FWD | 6.5 | 1.6% | 18.0 |
| 5 | Kamara ! | MID | 5.0 | 0.3% | 16.9 |
| 6 | Mings ! | DEF | 4.5 | 0.4% | 16.7 |
| 7 | Barkley ! | MID | 5.0 | 0.3% | 16.2 |
| 8 | Lindelöf ! | DEF | 4.5 | 0.3% | 16.2 |
! = last season's minutes do not describe this player's role here, either a short season or a move to this club.
Set-piece takers
| Situation | Order |
|---|---|
| Penalties | Buendía 1, N.Jackson 2 |
| Corners | McGinn 1, Buendía 2, Cash 3, Barkley 4 |
| Free kicks | Buendía 1 |
? = no Premier League games yet, so the start probability comes from where the player sits in his club's price order rather than from anything he has done here. Players on the same rung get the same number.
The number is the order FPL publishes, so 1 is first in line. An empty situation means FPL has not published an order for it, which is not the same as nobody taking them. Pre-season there are a lot of blanks.
Predicted XI
| Player | Pos | Price | Start |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suzuki | GKP | 5.0 | 93% |
| Lindelöf ! | DEF | 4.5 | 92% |
| Wan-Bissaka ! | DEF | 4.5 | 69% |
| Mings ! | DEF | 4.5 | 56% |
| Cash | DEF | 4.4 | 50% |
| Buendía | MID | 5.9 | 97% |
| McGinn | MID | 5.4 | 91% |
| Kamara ! | MID | 5.0 | 84% |
| George Hemmings | MID | 4.5 | 73% |
| N.Jackson | FWD | 6.5 | 83% |
| No clear starter (best option Abraham) | FWD | 5.5 | 21% |
This table answers one question: who starts. Projected points for the same players are in GoalIQ Premium, along with the tools that use them. Start is our projected chance of starting, not a lineup leak. We do not watch press conferences. The shape is the highest-probability starter at each position, so it will not always match the manager's formation.
Three things this table gets wrong in a way worth knowing. A player who missed most of last season is read as a rotation player, because the estimate leans on the minutes he actually played and it cannot tell an injury from a benching. A player who changed clubs is read from minutes he played for someone else. Both carry a ! here. And the shape is fixed, so a club that plays five in midfield will always have one real starter pushed out of this eleven.
Missing from that eleven, with our start chance and last season's minutes: Barkley (64%, 844 min) played a short season, so the estimate reads that as rotation. Garnacho (29%, 1261 min) played last season for Chelsea and Gomes (53%, 2829 min) for Wolves, so those minutes were not for this squad.
Squad turnover
36% of last season's minutes were played by players who have since left. The rating is fitted on results, so it has not priced that in yet.
Updated 07 Oct 2026 · GoalIQ model predictions are statistical estimates for fun and analysis, not betting advice, and not a gambling service.